28 November, 2013

media manipulation strategies

The ten points offered below, I could not find a direct attribution to Noam Chomsky (the ten media manipulation strategies are attributed to him, in accordance to the text widely in circulation over the Internet), although the rationale and argumentative thesis seem characteristic of his style. In addition, the direct references of the original text to the book “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” point to a rather controversial publication (see Ref. list for more info). As so, I cannot vouch for their authenticity or whether they are a product of Chomsky, since I could not find direct references to his work (or quotes from his work / speeches / lectures). However, I reproduce them here, since they carry a certain truth, analogies of which we may notice in our everyday lives, and could spark fertile debates. 

The reproduced text begins here.

Renowned critic and always MIT linguist Noam Chomsky, one of the classic voices of intellectual dissent in the last decade, has compiled a list of the ten most common and effective strategies resorted to by the agendas “hidden” to establish a manipulation of the population through the media. Historically the media have proven highly efficient to mold public opinion. Thanks to the media paraphernalia and propaganda, have been created ordestroyed social movements, justified wars, tempered financial crisis, spurredon some other ideological currents, and even given the phenomenon of media as producers of reality within the collective psyche. But how to detect the most common strategies for understanding thesepsychosocial tools which, surely, we participate? Fortunately Chomsky has been given the task of synthesizing and expose these practices, some more obvious and more sophisticated, but apparently all equally effective and, from a certain point of view, demeaning. Encourage stupidity, promote a sense of guilt, promote distraction, or construct artificial problems and then magically,solve them, are just some of these tactics.

1. The strategy of distraction
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction which is to divert public attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites, by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information. Distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. “Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to farm and other animals”.

2. Create problems, then offer solutions
This method is also called “problem -reaction- solution.” It creates a problem, a “situation” referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks in order that the public is the applicant’s security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Or create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights and the dismantling of public services.

3. The gradual strategy
Acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years. That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions (neoliberalism) were imposed during the 1980s and 1990s : the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, massive unemployment, wages, do not guarantee a decent income, ...so many changes that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once.

4. The strategy of deferring
Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then, because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.

5. Go to the public as a little child
Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly children’s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt a tone infantilizing. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less, then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger.”

6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection
Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for causing a short circuit on rational analysis, and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas , desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors …

7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity
Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes.”

8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity
Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated…

9. Self-blame Strengthen
To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual auto-devaluate and guilt himself, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its action. And, without action, there is no revolution!

10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves
Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than that of individuals about themselves.

The reproduced text ends here.

Avram Noam Chomsky (born December 7, 1928) is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, logician, political commentator and activist. Sometimes described as the "father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy. He has spent most of his career at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he is currently Professor Emeritus, and has authored over 100 books. He has been described as a prominent cultural figure, and was voted the "world's top public intellectual" in a 2005 poll. [1]

Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.
from the book “Media Control”, by Noam Chomsky, Seven Stories Press, 2002


The Internet is full of references quoting the “ten manipulation strategies” presented above.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

19 November, 2013

Zen Pencils : the Lucky ones

Gavin Aung Than is a freelance illustrator living in Melbourne, Australia. He has spent a number of years as corporate graphic designer before quitting to pursue his passion for illustration and cartooning. Since then he has been illustrating famous quotes, creating as he calls them "cartoon quotes from inspirational folks". His work is trully outstanding. View this sample here, and visit his website for more.
Original Post by the artist was on 28 Aug.2012 here.
Legend :
Richard Dawkins (1941-) is the world’s most famous atheist, thanks to his best-selling book The God Delusion and his tireless work to promote secularism through media and public appearances. Though he is probably more well-known today for his views on religion, Dawkins is first and foremost an evolutionary biologist. He has dedicated his life to studying evolution and to him it must be so bleeding obvious, and so much more awe-inspiring and beautiful, that the complexity of life on Earth is thanks to Natural Selection rather than Intelligent Design.

12 September, 2013

the future of food

Meat consumption worldwide has doubled in the last 20 years, and it is expected to double again by 2050. This is happening in large part because economies are growing and people can afford more meat. That's all good news. But raising meat takes a great deal of land and water and has a substantial environmental impact. Put simply, there’s no way to produce enough meat for 9 billion people. Yet we can't ask everyone to become vegetarians. We need more options for producing meat without depleting our resources.

The farm-to-table process hasn't changed much over the last 100 years. Innovation in this sector has tremendous market potential. Food scientists are creating healthful plant-based alternatives that taste just like eggs, chicken, and other sources of protein. Companies like Beyond Meat and Hampton Creek Foods are experimenting with new ways to use heat and pressure to turn plants into foods that look and taste just like meat and eggs.

Beyond Eggs, Hampton Creek Foods' egg substitute, doesn't contain the high cholesterol of real eggs. Companies like these are at the cutting edge of plant protein research and development, with a goal of driving innovation and progress on meat-free plates around the world. Even spices are getting re-made: a company called Nu-Tek Food Science has found a way to make potassium chloride taste just like salt, with only a fraction of the sodium.

But why should people consider replacing meat in their diets ? The answer lies along three principal motivators: health, because we know high consumption of red meat correlates with higher chances of certain cancers; and the environment, because we know that conventional meat production is one of the biggest drivers of climate change, as well as water and pollution; and ethics, since the animal factories that produce most of our meat and milk are brutal places where animals suffer needlessly.

On the other hand the future of food as we view it today as consumers, and through the eyes and interests of the big corporations, is somewhat different to the ne proposed above. The trend of the last two decades or so for genetic engineering of food crops is as controversial today as ever, as many of the large agro corporations that use this technology position themselves as the answer to the world food crisis and further consolidate the seed supply. On that front, in 2004 a focused documentary film was released, under the same direct title "The Future of Food". The Future of Food distills the complex technology and consumer issues surrounding major changes in the food system today - genetically engineered foods, patenting, and the corporatization of food - into terms the average person can understand. It empowers consumers to realize the consequences of their food choices on our future.



The Future of Food has been a key tool in the American and international anti-GMO grassroots activist movements and played widely in the environmental and activist circuits since its release in 2004. The Future of Food continues to be a key tool used by activists and educators who call for increased attention to this issue.


GMO OMG is the next documentary you want to put on your to-watch list. Coming out on September 13th, the film by Jeremy Seifert explores a topic that ranks up there as one of the biggest of our lifetime, along with plastic pollution and, you know, global warming. Genetically Modified Organisms and omg! what does it mean for our food, our health, and our economy. Specifically, it "explores the systematic corporate takeover and potential loss of humanity’s most precious and ancient inheritance: seeds." [2]

In "Food, Inc.", the 2008 documentary film, filmmaker Robert Kenner lifts the veil on our nation's food industry, exposing the highly mechanized underbelly that has been hidden from the American consumer with the consent of our government's regulatory agencies, USDA and FDA. Our nation's food supply is now controlled by a handful of corporations that often put profit ahead of consumer health, the livelihood of the American farmer, the safety of workers and our own environment. We have bigger-breasted chickens, the perfect pork chop, herbicide-resistant soybean seeds, even tomatoes that won't go bad, but we also have new strains of E. coli ; the harmful bacteria that causes illness for an estimated 73,000 Americans annually. We are riddled with widespread obesity, particularly among children, and an epidemic level of diabetes among adults.

As a shocking addition, "Our Daily Bread" the earlier (2005) documentary film by Nikolaus Geyrhalter, was hailed as a wide-screen tableau of a feast which isn’t always easy to digest ; and in which we all take part. A pure, meticulous and high-end film experience that enables the audience to form their own ideas. Welcome to the world of industrial food production and high-tech farming! To the rhythm of conveyor belts and immense machines, the film looks without commenting into the places where food is produced in Europe: monumental spaces, surreal landscapes and bizarre sounds - a cool, industrial environment which leaves little space for individualism. People, animals, crops and machines play a supporting role in the logistics of this system which provides our society’s standard of living. Strong filmmaking. So masterfully shot, universal, shocking, eerie, profound, no narration, just stark reality.

On another front, forty years ago, advances in fertilizers and pesticides boosted crop yield and fed a growing planet. Today, demand for food fueled by rises in worldwide consumption of meat and protein is again outpacing farmers ability to keep up. It's time for the next Green Revolution. Wired magazine has compiled and offers for study a series of illustrations (by Stephen Doyle and Zack Zavislak) that help illustrate the point and convey the meaning for the need of change. To explore the Wired Atlas, use the thumbnails to navigate from page to page. Click the main image to zoom, and click again for the navigation box to scroll through the spread.

A report released in May 2013 by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization reminds us that there are more than 1,900 edible insect species on Earth, hundreds of which are already part of the diet in many countries. In fact, some two billion people eat a wide variety of insects regularly, both cooked and raw; only in Western countries does the practice retain an "ick" factor among the masses. Why eat something that we usually swat away or battle with insecticides? For starters, many insects are packed with protein, fiber, good fats, and vital minerals - as much or more than many other food sources. And raising and harvesting insects requires much less land than raising cows, pigs, and sheep. Insects convert food into protein much more efficiently than livestock do - meaning they need less food to produce more product. They also emit considerably fewer greenhouse gases than most livestock. [1]

15 March, 2013

The wealth inequality video

Wealth inequality in the United States, also known as the "wealth gap", refers to the unequal distribution of financial assets among residents of the United States. Wealth includes the values of homes, automobiles, businesses, savings, and investments. Those who acquire a great deal of financial wealth do so primarily through the appreciation of fiscal portfolios. For this reason, financial wealth involves only stocks and mutual funds, and other investments. Hence, there is greater financial inequality than simple net worth disparities. Various sociological statistics suggest the severity of wealth inequality "with the top 10% possessing 80% of all financial assets and the bottom 90% holding only 20% of all financial wealth." Although different from income inequality, the two are often interrelated. [1]

The video has sparked considerable criticism as well, since it does seem elaborately designed to arouse commotion (excellent, simple fluid graphics, deep reassuring voice for the narrative, etc.). Read some articles in Forbes here and here. Since the time the video has gone viral, the accumulated views, range in the millions, but it is still not clear who produced it, and it is clear that no solution is being proposed to the “problem” of wealth inequality identified in the video. The video does seem posed to influence you with emotional arguments, hence bordering the area of “marketing material”. Read some more counter-arguments here and here.

The Wealth Inequality in America infographic video was posted on YouTube back in November 2012. The video is a good example of what the best infographic designs accomplish. The data sources are clearly listed at the end of the video, though it’s not clear who created and is publishing the video. The account seems to have been created for just uploading this video. Well, if you wish to know more, then here you will find background info on the viral infographics presentation video



But what a wonderful coincidence it is, that at the same time a documentary titled “Inequality for All” was an unexpected hit at the recent Sundance film festival, arguing that US capitalism has fatally abandoned the middle classes while making the super-rich richer. Inequality for All looks at the topic of widening income inequality through the eyes of noted economic policy expert Robert Reich. At the heart of the film is a simple proposition: what is a good society, and what role does the widening income gap play in the deterioration of our nation's economic health ? The creators aim for the documentary-film to be a paradigm-shifting, eye-opening experience for the American public (and not only, I guess) ; to accurately show through a non-partisan perspective why extreme income inequality is such an important topic for US citizens today and for the future of America. Visit the documentary’s info website here. Read more on the film’s impact here.

Furthermore, some points I would like to put forth :

Wealth or income should not be the only indices denoting inequality. Let’s consider for a minute housing or education, or access to public amenities, infrastructure or services. There are numerous factors determining the equality of a populace, and a number of them when measured can be used as indicators. So we should not limit ourselves to monitoring wealth distribution (although housing or education, for example, can be included in the equation as realised expenditure) in order to determine equality, and in even populace happiness or satisfaction.

Of course one should not neglect to analyse what comes after, i.e. as a result from the observed wealth inequality. Just to raise a single point, you should not take for granted the course that people take in order to get in public office. It is definitely not a coincidence that people with more wealth, have a “louder”, or “more frequently heard” voice.

It is apparent that what is presented here, with US collated data, is applicable to the rest of the world, in either similar or grossly exaggerated fashion ; but the truth remains that it is applicable. And of course, in turn the big fish subjects to the same model the smaller fish, and it will go on and on indefinitely unless people are willing to change it. But that again seems to be unattainable. Unfortunately in that case, we do not select what we are born into. And please don’t tell me that it’s all a matter of your choices or effort, because if you were born into a ravished central African family, the chances of you being the future president of a conglomerate are rather “slim”.

Hence a popular argument, that states that “It always has been that way, it so is, and so shall it continue to be in the future”. Well, I do dislike to disappoint you, but that is not the truth. There have been notable periods for the now so called Western World, that wealth inequality (or inequality in general) was not the case. The same is even more true for the rest of the world.

NOTES [2] :
Generally speaking, wealth is the value of everything a person or family owns, minus any debts. However, for purposes of studying the wealth distribution, economists define wealth in terms of marketable assets, such as real estate, stocks, and bonds, leaving aside consumer durables like cars and household items because they are not as readily converted into cash and are more valuable to their owners for use purposes than they are for resale. Once the value of all marketable assets is determined, then all debts, such as home mortgages and credit card debts, are subtracted, which yields a person's net worth.
Economists use the concept of financial wealth which is defined as net worth minus net equity in owner-occupied housing. Financial wealth is a more 'liquid' concept than marketable wealth, since one's home is difficult to convert into cash in the short term. It thus reflects the resources that may be immediately available for consumption or various forms of investments.
There is a difference between wealth and income. Income is what people earn from work, but also from dividends, interest, and any rents or royalties that are paid to them on properties they own. In theory, those who own a great deal of wealth may or may not have high incomes, depending on the returns they receive from their wealth, but in reality those at the very top of the wealth distribution usually have the most income. It is important to note that for the rich, most of that income does not come from "working" as we the rest perceive it.

[2] G. William Domhoff, “Wealth, Income, and Power”, http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

10 March, 2013

Get your priorities (values) straight

When people are in a depression they do not want to hear of their bad selections or erroneous state of thinking, or to that effect that they need to change this and that in their mentalité or mode of acting. In fact, what they only want you to tell them, is when their “bad streak” is going to end, and when they will get back to being and acting as they once were accustomed to. Then, maybe, they will consider making themselves better ; and I say maybe, because in most cases they wouldn’t give a damn about what you would say to them, once they are “flyin’ high”.

One of the more bizarre takes on Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's death comes from Associated Press business reporter Pamela Sampson, were in her article “Little Reaction In Oil Market To Chavez Death”, states that :

“Chavez invested Venezuela's oil wealth into social programs including state-run food markets, cash benefits for poor families, free health clinics and education programs. But those gains were meagre compared with the spectacular construction projects that oil riches spurred in glittering Middle Eastern cities, including the world's tallest building in Dubai and plans for branches of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums in Abu Dhabi.” [1]

 “That's right.”, notes Jim Naureckas at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR),

“Chavez squandered his nation's oil money on healthcare, education and nutrition when he could have been building the world's tallest building or his own branch of the Louvre. What kind of monster has priorities like that ?” [2]

The reporter’s aim of course, was not into criticizing Chavez’s policy prioritizing. It serves though, as a striking reminder that people do not see things under the same perspective, even when those “things” could be expressions of what should be universally recognized values. 

Those said, was to prepare the ground of what follows, and that will not going to be soothing or nice, or kind.

At some point – whether all made-up and settled, or temporarily aggravated and miserable, imagining and creating or have reached a dead-end, either poor or rich, booming with health, or stricken by problems – you have to realise that the society has definitely taken a wrong turn, down a path that at the best, will lead to more misery for the majority. At some point you must realise that what separates you from the majority, is actually a very thin line. It has nothing to do with your belongings, your money in the bank, or your society status in your microcosm. It is only determined by the moment when the fish that is bigger than you, will decide that it has fed up with all the others, and it is time to eat you. And of course, the examples are numerous.

And because the examples list is so long, I am not feeling like I am treading on unknown territory now. You see, It is NOT my fault, that you have turned sort-sighted and deaf, illiterate at worst or incapable of having a thought-provoking discussion. Most of you, do not listen anymore or talk anymore to people that DO have something to say, and shout or write it. I do not care whether you are poor or rich, tired, or angry, or sad, or plainly fed-up with what goes on around you, but the fact is that YOU have chosen to shut the voices of logic, reason, truth and solidarity out. It has been YOUR fault, and when you realise it (if ever), you’d better hope that it is not too late to do anything ; because if it will, then your children shall pay a very dear price.

Those taken into account, at some point you will painfully realise that what you though was “the other peoples’ problem”, you actually helped create with your stance, attitude and deeds (voting included), and what is worse, it has now turned big and ugly and it’s coming to bite you, along with everyone else.

Wake up ! There is MORE to economic progress than growth. There is MORE to societal health than a construction boom. Those, start with you, but they also reflect back to you. There is MORE in life than career and wealth. There is MORE in distributing evenly, than phenomenal, though temporary, gains. After all, we are all (indiscriminately) going to be here for one meagre lifetime. Make it worth it ; and I am not speaking in currency terms. Live it in meaning, to you and others around you, happy and fulfilling.

To bring it in context with the articles mentioned above, one of the most inspiring lines I’ve ever heard uttered on the “big screen”, was the following : “Brothers, what we do in life, echoes in eternity”. By endorsing policies that cater for your populace (and I am not speaking about Chavez now), you will be remembered of for a couple of generations. Maybe historians will judge you fairly and recount your deeds, to inspire a few generations more to come.

On the other hand, the truth is that a well-constructed building, does have a longer lifespan, when compared to the former. But then again, that only applies until some delluded maniac, decides to ram it with a fully laden airplane.

08 March, 2013

The “global village” : the Internet’s technological imperialism

A global electronic culture, in one sense or another, can bring about a union of peoples. The question is whether this union only offers a less visible - and therefore more insidious - communal dissociation than was effected by the failed political unions of the past. Recognizing such things is painfully difficult ; how many Yugoslavs in 1990 could have looked into their own hearts and the hearts of their neighbors and descried the conflagration to come? And it may be precisely this sort of recognition that an online culture suppresses more effectively than any external authority possibly could. Many indeed - by their own testimony - have seized upon the Net as an opportunity, not to face what they are, but to live out their fantasies. [1]

Furthermore, expertise - the kind one exports to other nations - is always "embedded in a community and can never be totally extracted from or become a replacement for that community. When one attempts the abstraction and applies the result across cultural boundaries, the logic and assumptions of that technology can prove bitterly corrosive. Worse even, the kind of community from which Western technical systems commonly arise is, for the most part, noncommunity ; especially once typified by the purely technical, single-dimensional, commercially motivated, and wholly rationalized environments of corporate research and development organizations. [2]

Take for example the fact that within our “western” society, food is predominately subjected to technological manipulation. We can produce various artificial foods, supposedly nourishing, and the inevitable temptation is to bring such products to bear upon the problems of hunger in the world. But this meets surprising resistance. “We must not think that people who are the victims of famine will eat anything. Western people might, since they no longer have any beliefs or traditions or sense of the sacred. But not others. We have thus to destroy the whole social structure, for food is one of the structures of society.” [Jacques Ellul, 1990]

The entire technical infrastructure, including the computer networks upon which everything is increasingly founded, enforces an imperial "wisdom" of its own. Even the most distributed networks have in effect a very strong centralizing character, a governing logic, a systematic requirement for interaction, a “natural order of things”. Our rush to wire the world will some day be seen to have spawned a suffering as great as that caused by this century's most ruthless dictators. There is no doubt about what we are up to. Our quest for a global village begins with the implementation of physical networks and accompanying technology. Then, of course, the local communities must adapt to this global, culture-destroying machine they have suddenly come up against. This sequence is vivid proof that the global village has absolutely nothing to do with culture, value, or meaning -- nothing to do with the traditional significance of community, with democratic values, or with anything else that grows up from the healthy depths of the human being. It is, purely and simply, the extension of a technical and commercial logic implicit in the wires already laid down.

In this sense, even if in no other, the global village is a kind of global totalitarianism. And one thing it asks of us is clear : in attacking any local problem we must yield first of all, not to the meanings inherent in the problem, but to the constraining necessity of the global system itself. The village farmers in Nepal may not feel any need of a satellite dish, but they will receive one nevertheless ; it is a prerequisite for "development." [1] And that imposition of technology, destroys the fabric of meaning by which communities are knit together, and hence technological union does not bring together peoples ; it actually breaks them apart, re-educates them to a different, “developed” model, only to bring them nearer again (but not communaly together, in the physical sense) under the evolving global society.

Human life can be sustained only within a sea of meaning, not a network of information. When we disrupt this meaning with our detached logic and unrooted information, we cast the “under-developed that we wish to educate” into the same void that we have been able to endure only by filling it with endless diversions. However, not everyone has access to our diversions ; and many of those who do, are not so quickly willing to sell their souls for inane stimulations. Religious fanaticism, may prove more meaningful. [1]

[1] Stephen L. Talbott, “The Future Does Not Compute: Transcending the Machines in Our Midst”, 1995, O'Reilly & Associates
[2] Doris M. Schoenhoff, “The Barefoot Expert”, 1993, AbeBooks

28 January, 2013

Holstee and their manifesto

Over a year ago, Ι came across what initially looked like a typography work. Alas, you only need to read, only to realise the impact that carefully arranged words can have. The Holstee Manifesto is a call to action to live a life full of intention, creativity, passion, and community. And that basically is an introduction. You can leave the rest to your mind, emotion and experiences. It helps though to watch the short movie offered further below.

In 2009 two brothers and a friend started a small company Holstee, with a view towards producing clothing and lifestyle products with a twist. Apart from upcycled, those were were to be full-lifecycle conscious or friendly products. They started with a tshirt , then their wallet came, etc. Our mention though here, is not for their products, but for their manifesto.



The LifeCycle Film came about as a desire to bring the energy and passion behind the Manifesto to life through biking that they love. This Film is a celebration. It is a celebration of gatherings, of diversity, of life, and of the beauty of shared experience. This message that has since been shared over 500,000 times and viewed over 60 million times online, in all its forms, as Holstee say "has confirmed for us that with genuine positive intentions, anything is possible". 

24 January, 2013

a glimpse into Corporate America

Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, military control or corporate ties. Oligarchy should not be associated always as a rule by wealth (the appropriate term for that being plutocracy), although wealth is a common distinguishing factor. Oligarchs can simply be a privileged group, and do not have to be connected by bloodlines as in a monarchy [1]


Definitions
Corporate oligarchy is a form of power, governmental or operational, where such power effectively rests with a small, elite group of inside individuals, sometimes from a small group of educational institutions, or influential economic entities or devices, such as banks, media producers and broadcasters, commercial entities, lobbyists that act in complicity with, or at the whim of the oligarchy, often with little or no regard for constitutionally protected prerogative. Monopolies are sometimes granted to state-controlled entities, such as the Royal Charter granted to the East India Company, or privileged bargaining rights to unions (labor monopolies) with very partisan political interests. Today's multinational corporations function as corporate oligarchies with influence over democratically elected officials. The severity of the effect increases as corporations transcend the national borders and become transnationals.

Corporatocracy is a term used to suggest an economic and political system controlled by corporations or corporate interests. The term was used by author John Perkins in his 2004 book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man", where he described corporatocracy as a collective composed of corporations, banks, and governments. This collective is known as what author C. Wright Mills would call the "Power Elite". The Power Elite are wealthy individuals who hold prominent positions in Corporatocracies. These individuals control the process of determining society's economic and political policies. [2]

Corporate America et al.
Interlocking directorates (defined as the linkages among corporations created by individuals who sit on two or more corporate boards) have been a source of research attention since the Progressive Era at the turn of the 20th century. Today corporate interlocks are analyzed with bigger databases and sophisticated network programs. And the idea that the few dominate the many will not come as news to those gathered either to "occupy wall street" or to "occupy everywhere". But up until these current days it has been more or less a "conspiracy theory" level event, that a few corporations could control the global market and essentially the world.


An organised study led by S. Vitali of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, showed that out of over 43,000 transnational corporations (TNCs), relatively few control almost 80% of the global economy. The team found a core of 1318 companies (mostly financial services companies) with an average of 20 control links each amongst themselves. These 1318 companies represent only 0.7% of the TNCs but 18.7% of the revenue of all TNCs. When one adds in the 59.8% of the revenues from companies on the wing of the bow-tie controlled by those in the knot, these companies control almost 80% of the global economy. And to top that, "4/10 of the control over the economic value of TNCs in the world is held, via a complicated web of ownership relations, by a group of 147 TNCs in the core, which has almost full control over itself." [3], [4]

An article back in 2005 by G.W. Domhoff concluded that : "… many corporate leaders don't just sit at their home corporation attending to their own business. Through meeting together on boards of directors, those who are interlocking directors develop social cohesion and shared perspectives to go with their economic power bases. This is why such people are the core of the leadership group for the upper class and the corporate community, which I call the power elite. However, we should not make too much out of the exact shape of the interlock network at any given moment because too much can change when the corporate network is no longer made up strictly of owners and financiers who are using their directorships to coordinate their economic interests." [5]

The truth is that by opting out the facts that individuals tend to band together and to the strongest leaders, and simply that oligarchy has been a most successful model in accumulating wealth and exerting power control all along since the Ancient days, which logically points us towards the reasons why we see such corporate concentration, we are in danger of literally masking a real stability risk for the global economy, with an illuminati-global-conspiracy-type-hollywood-drama-thriller, and end up with a mere witch hunt, which in turn will only be a very convenient down rating of the whole issue. 



"About 2400 years ago a Greek general named Pericles stood before an Athens audience and proclaimed, "We are called a democracy, for the administration is in the hands of the many and not the few, with equal justice to all alike in their private dispute." Let this current Greek crisis serve as a reminder to all of us that democracy is under attack today. It will only survive if you and I (the People) insist on governments that are "in the hands of the many and not the few." [7]

As corporations become increasingly interdependent, and their workings and influence globally coordinated, some do try to navigate the apparent endless maze. 

LittleSis is a project of Public Accountability Initiative, a 501(c)3 organization focused on corporate and government accountability that receives financial support from the Sunlight Foundation, Harnisch Foundation, and Elbaz Family Foundation, and benefit from free software written by the open source community. Their work focuses on bringing transparency to influential social networks by tracking the key relationships of politicians, business leaders, lobbyists, financiers, and their affiliated institutions.

LittleSis features interlinked profiles of powerful individuals and organizations in the public and private sectors. Profiles detail a wealth of information vital to any investigation of the ways power and money guide the formulation of public policy, from board memberships to campaign contributions, old school ties to government contracts. The site currently offers profiles of 79884 people and 27169 organizations in varying stages of completion. These include, but are not limited to:

Politicians: members of Congress since 1979, governors since 1974, Bush and Obama administration officials.
Business people: Fortune 1000 executives and directors, members of the Forbes 400.
Lobbyists who have lobbied on behalf of Fortune 1000 companies.
Government bodies: US House & Senate; agencies ranging from the Department of Defense to the IRS.
Businesses: Fortune 1000 companies, lobbying firms, top law firms, and other private companies.
Non-profits such as foundations, think tanks, and political organizations.

LittleSis offers some data about these people and organizations themselves, but it's focus is on the relationships between them. There are currently 475186 relationships linking entities profiled in the database.

They Rule aims to provide a glimpse of some of the relationships of the US ruling class. It takes as its focus the boards of some of the most powerful U.S. companies, which share many of the same directors. Some individuals sit on 5, 6 or 7 of the top 1000 companies. It allows users to browse through these interlocking directories and run searches on the boards and companies. A user can save a map of connections complete with their annotations and email links to these maps to others. They Rule is a starting point for research about these powerful individuals and corporations. They Rule is an online tool where you can map and visualize board interlocks. You can look up specific people or simply play around and click to see various interlocks. 

Extras
Some interesting information related to the subject herein, either directly or as a "spin-off", that I didn't want to include in the main body.



Time stamps for this interview :
0:00:10 Defining the Corporatocracy, the revolving door policy
0:04:00 Defining an Economic Hitman, creating a global empire
0:06:25 The assassination of Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán, President of Guatemala
0:07:50 The assassination of Jaime Roldós Aguilera, President of Ecuador
0:11:20 The assassination of Salvador Allende, President of Chile
0:13:20 The assassination of Omar Torrijos, President of Panama
0:16:00 Killing Manuel Noriega (Panama) together with 2000 civilians
0:20:35 Replacing Mohammad Mosaddegh (President of Iran) with a dictator
0:23:20 Hugo Chavez (President of Venezuela) as key figure for a democratic revolution
0:27:15 Saddam Hussein (President of Irak), Military as the last option
0:30:30 The "divide and conquer"-principle, chaos as a tool, Africa
0:34:25 Causality, Problems resulting from destoying the economies of poor countries
0:36:00 Top military people don't want war, corporations want war
0:37:25 Desperate people : "Guerillas", "communists", "terrorists"
0:43:50 Replacing the Gold Standard with the Oil Standard
0:48:00 Energy and consumption, oil as an instrument of control
0:51:40 Reflections, transforming the empire
0:54:20 Greed as a measure of "success", maximizing profit at any cost
0:58:25 Sustainability - Absurd question : Should we become sustainable ?
1:02:00 Fate of Coincidence, how to react to coincidence, future generations
1:04:45 Change - How to make the world a better place ?
1:08:15 End of interview

Oiligarchy is a playable commentary on the oil industry. The player takes the role of an “oiligarch” managing the extraction business in the homeland and overseas and lobbies the government to keep the carbon-fossil based economy as profitable as possible. Now you can be the protagonist of the petroleum era. Explore and drill around the world, corrupt politicians, stop alternative energies and increase the oil addiction. Be sure to have fun before the resources begin to deplete !


The average CEO pay of companies in the S&P 500 Index rose to $12.94 million in 2011. Overall, the average level of CEO pay in the S&P 500 Index increased 13.9 percent in 2011, following a 22.8 percent increase in CEO pay in 2010. CEOs supposedly deserve all this money for increasing shareholder value. Runaway CEO pay is one reason why income inequality is growing in the United States. A Congressional Budget Office report found that inequality has risen dramatically, with the top 1 percent receiving most of the income growth between 1979 and 2007. [6]


Resources, should you wish to expand more on the subjects :
welcome dear reader.

blank

What you are browsing through is the initial form of a gazette, realised at this stage by a collection of posts brought together, from various fields & selected topics, aiming towards your entertainment and information. Some are own generated, others are processed re-ups from the blogosphere. Please feel free to browse, read, and distribute the content here.

blank

If you find what you read here as interesting, entertaining or thought-provocative, please tell it to your friends. New readers are always welcome. If you have copyright claims, please let us know, and we will amend accordingly.

blank

Images presented herein, are the property of their originators, unless stated otherwise. The METRONOME gazette wishes to declare that to the best of its knowledge, all photos and information presented in this website are true and valid, however it carries no responsibility as to the accuracy of the depictions, or wording of the posts, that are not of its own origination.

blank

Please do not hesitate to contact us with any inquiry or question you may have. See the Contact details section.
  

blank

about

blank

contact

blank

editorial

blank

theNEWSroom

blank

theMAGAZINErack

blank

DIY projects

blank

GAMESZONE

blank

GoingOUT

blank

Food4Thought

blank

PROJECTS

blank

blank

blank